The Personal is Political

This is a blog where I will be spouting out all of my personal political arguments, thoughts and beliefs. I encourage interaction and you're more than welcome to submit or ask questions. I identify as a feminist and most of my personal philosophies are built around social justice concepts. If you want to jump right to stuff I've written myself check the "the personal is politic" tag. Creative Commons License
The Personal is Political by Ragen Ashlie Roberts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Recent Tweets @

kyssthis16:

note-a-bear:

amischiefofmice:

orfs:

averyterrible:

thisplaceisdespair:

flatluigi:

stormingtheivory:

So can we talk about the absolutely stunning duplicity going on here?

holy shit

ok, why the fuck is the graph upside down. that is incredibly misleading

Because its from the Florida Department of Justice, and they have a mandate here.

for those who have trouble inverting it in their head, ftfy:

image

this is some of the most blatant twisting of info i have ever seen holy shit

woooooow

See…..

(via face--the--strange)

cielrouge:

Added some more titles so this is the most up-to-date list…

image

image

A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki (Jan 31st, 2013) - In Tokyo, 16-old Nao has decided there’s only one escape from her aching loneliness and her classmates’ bullying. But before she ends it all, Nao…

(via elysethegorgonqueen)

…A white graduate of a public Michigan university who wishes to pass his historical privilege on to his children may freely lobby the board of that university in favor of an expanded legacy admissions policy, whereas a black Michigander who was denied the opportunity to attend that very university cannot lobby the board in favor of a policy that might give his children a chance that he never had and that they might never have absent that policy.
Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent following the Supreme Court decision to uphold the Michigan Ban on Affirmative Action in public universities (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-682_j4ek.pdf)

(via gnomequeen)

Who is to say that robbing a people of its language is less violent than war?

     Gloria E. Anzaldúa, Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza     (via oldgreyhamster)

Robbing a people of their language, culture, family history, etc…

(via sweatersnervously)

(via inthefrankensteinplace)

But imagine Steve Rogers ferociously defending women who get harassed on the streets. Steve going super red when Darcy tells him about all the shit she faces. Steve publicly denouncing MRA’s and most republicans for making life harder for women and especially getting pissed when governors go on tv and talk about how poor people should just stop being poor because he’s BEEN THERE and he knows how hard it is to function day to day, much less deal with the people running your country telling you you’re a drain on society. Steve Rogers doesn’t like bullies, right, no matter where they’re from.
Cam during a super discussion about a Steve Rogers who’s so there for social justice and modern values (via nollag)

(via thegeminisage)

Yet, in just the past year, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that a woman can be fired if her boss finds her attractive, a New York court decided that unpaid interns can’t sue for sexual harassment, and the Paycheck Fairness Act was defeated by Republicans who claimed women actually prefer lower-paying jobs.

2damnfeisty:

bellecosby:

bellecosby:

Beyonce released an album with no promotion and slayed

Lupita won the oscars

Quvenzhane Wallis is the new Annie

Rihanna continually shits on your fav

Jazmine Sullvian is making new music

A shift is happening in the earth

I can feel it 

Y’all

Janet Jackson is rumored to be making new music 

Lupita is the new ambassador Lacome and was named most beautiful person by People

Erykah Badu is the face of a couture brand

(via anukii)

The female ‘confidence gap’ is a sham
Women’s lack of confidence could be just a keen understanding of just how little society values them, writes Jessica Valenti  (via guardian)

(via cognitivedissonance)

fuckyeahnerdpr0n:

gypsyrose27:

im-jean-valjean:

inlovewithwhitemen:

iragersaurus:

silentrhetoric:

naturalbods:

Truth.

Wow.. I didn’t know that

File under : things I wasn’t taught in school

Reblog the hell out of this everyone.

image

It’s like you guys want to be outraged and offended.

That’s not true. If memory serves, the sculptor modeled Lady Liberty after his mother. And she was not a black woman, thus that was not the original. So silly.

Variations:   Versions of this item circulated in July 2012 included the following graphic with text claiming that it was the “original” Statue of Liberty, which was replaced with the current version after it was “refused by America.” The image is actually a photo of the Lady Liberty statue at the Agrément roundabout on the Caribbean island of St. Maarten, which was sculpted by Theodore Bonev in 2007 to commemorate the 159th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation. It has no connection (other than a thematic one) to the Statue of Liberty in New York. 

image


Origins:   This item is difficult to explicate because it makes so many (sometimes conflicting) claims, so we’ll distill its essence to four primary claims and discuss those:

  • The model for the Statue of Liberty (i.e., the woman who posed for the sculptor, or whose portrait the sculptor used) was a black woman.
  • The Statue of Liberty was intended to depict a woman with features representative of the “black race.”
  • The Statue of Liberty was created as a tribute to black Civil War soldiers.
  • The Statue of Liberty was intended to symbolize the end of slavery in the USA.

Of these claims, the first three are demonstrably untrue; the final one may have some small element of truth to it. 

We’ll begin by examining some of the specific pieces of evidence offered in the piece quoted above: 

  • In a book called “The Journey of The Songhai People”, according to Dr. Jim Haskins, a member of the National Education Advisory Committee of the Liberty-Ellis Island Committee, professor of English at the University of Florida, and prolific black author, points out that what stimulated the original idea for that 151 foot statue in the harbor. He says that the idea for the creation of the statue initially was the part that black soldiers played in the ending of black African bondage in the United States. On his web page, Dr. Haskins explains that he wrote no book with the title The Journey of the Songhai People, nor did he ever state that the statue was presented by the people of France to the people of the United States to honor the role of black soldiers in the Civil War.
  • It was widely known then that it was black soldiers who played the pivotal role in winning the war, and this gift would be a tribute to their prowess. It is undeniable that blacks did indeed fight in the Civil War (on both sides), and that some of them were awarded high honors for their bravery in battle. However, black soldiers were not allowed to take part in combat until the final stages of the war, and estimates place their numbers in the Union Army at about 130,000 out of 2,100,000 men total (about 12% of the total). While this figure is hardly insignificant, claiming blacks played the “pivotal role in winning the war” is a bit of an exaggeration. And whatever blacks contributed to the war effort, even today, with our advantages of more than a hundred years’ hindsight and access to tens of thousands of books and other sources that collectively chronicle the Civil War in almost minute-by-minute detail, the average American is little aware that blacks took active part in the conflict or is familiar with their specific contributions. (One scarcely glimpsed any black soldiers in film depictions of the Civil War until the story of the war’s first all-black volunteer company was portrayed in 1989’s Glory, for example.) The level of knowledge about this subject was far less in the era immediately following the war, when communications systems were rudimentary (telephone, radio, and recorded sound did not yet exist), comprehensive accounts of the war had not been prepared (even the participants knew little of what took place outside of their direct experience), and when the still-widespread prejudice against blacks meant that their role in the war was minimized or ignored (the war may have ended slavery, but it by no means resulted in the white population’s acceptance of blacks as their social equals — the U.S. Army itself remained segregated until after World War II). The notion that over a century ago, in a country thousands of miles away, details of the Civil War unfamiliar to the people who actually fought it were “widely known” is too much to accept without substantial supporting documentation.

  • You may go and see the original model of the Statue of Liberty, with the broken chains at her feet and in her left hand. Go to the Museum of the City of N.Y, Fifth Avenue and 103rd Street (212) 534-1672 or call the same number and dial ext. 208 and speak to Peter Simmons and he can send you some documentation. First of all, there was no one “original model” for the Statue of Liberty — sculptor Frederic Auguste Bartholdi’s design went through many evolutionary changes before he settled on its final form. The removal of chains that appeared in Lady Liberty’s hands in earlier models was done not because it “would be offensive to the U.S. South,” but for aesthetic reasons. As the same Dr. Haskins cited above wrote: “At first, she held a broken chain in her other hand, to symbolize the broken chains of bondage; later, Bartholdi decided she should hold a tablet, inscribed with the date of the Declaration of Independence, and that a fragment of chain would be on the ground, as if she had already thrown it there.” Broken chains fit the statue’s theme, whether the message of liberty gained is applied to America’s independence from Britain, France’s then recent struggle with Prussia, or the freeing of African Americans from slavery. Pictures of the models for the Statue of Liberty held by The Museum of the City of New York are available for viewing via the web.

  • Check with the NY Times magazine, part II May 18, 1986. We did, and we found that, in anticipation of the upcoming July 4 centennial celebration of the Statue of Liberty (and the culmination of a four-year, 66-million-dollar effort to repair and restore the famous monument), The New York Times magazine on that date was chock full of articles about the statue. None of them said anything even remotely supportive of the claims made here, however; in fact, they said quite the opposite. As Richard Bernstein, The New York Times' Paris bureau chief noted in that issue, the statue was intended as a tribute to both the American achievement of and French hopes for a nation of republic and liberty; in a sense, it was meant as an abstract symbol of the idealized future of France just as much as the realized past of America. Creating a tribute to those who fought the Civil War (or, even more specifically, to black Civil War soldiers) was far too concrete (and too distinctly American) a concept to have been a part of their plans.
  • The dark original face of the Statue of Liberty can be seen in the NY Post June 17, 1986, also the Post stated the reason for the broken chains at her feet. Yes, the “original” face of the Statue of Liberty was dark, for the simple reason that the materials of which it was made were originally dark. Eric Fettmann, the author of the New York Post article cited above, wrote:
    As for the photo of the supposed “African” face featured in The Post, the picture is not — as incorrectly captioned — an early model, but shows the actual face that now stands over New York Harbor. The photo, as shown in Marvin Trachtenberg’s marvelous 1976 architectural history of the statue, shows Liberty’s head during construction on what was then Bedloe’s Island shortly before its dedication in October 1886.

    It appears “black” for a simple reason: the copper statue’s original color was not the familiar green we see today — the patina that naturally occurs over the course of repeated exposure to the elements — but a much darker orange-red bronze. (Actually, as the oxidation process continued, the statue first turned pitch black before reaching its current green hue, as Bartholdi knew it would.)
    The reason that Fettmann offers for the broken chains is that Bartholdi “adapted the statue from a failed project to construct a giant lighthouse at the entrance to the Suez Canal in Egypt”; Bartholdi’s original design for the lighthouse included a female figure with the broken chains of slavery at her feet.
  • Finally, you may check with the French Mission or the French Embassy at the U.N or in Washington, DC and ask for some original French material on the Statue of Liberty, including the Bartholdi original model. The Embassy of France located in Washington would prefer not to be contacted by those looking for this ‘original French material on the Statue of Liberty’ because they can’t help them. According to its Press and Information Service, “We constantly get calls from people requesting for information [on this issue], and we do not have reliable information to give them.”

The statue wasn’t meant as a tribute to black Civil War soldiers, nor were the women who modeled for it black. 

Frederic Auguste Bartholdi, then a young French artist, was commissioned in 1865 by Edouard de Laboulaye and a group of influential French citizens to work on a monument to liberty, intended as a gift from the people of France to the people of the United States of America. Most sources agree that Bartholdi used his mistress (later his wife) and mother as Lady Liberty’s models, with his mother serving as the inspiration for the face and his wife for the torso. 

Neither of these women was black. 

As for the purpose of the statue, an 1879 design patent granted to Bartholdi contained his description of the work as “a commemorative monument of the independence of the United States.” There was no mention of black soldiers or the Civil War. Rather, the description specified “the independence of the United States,” an event which predated the Civil War — and the abolition of slavery — by a few generations. 

Dr. Haskins holds that the impetus behind the Statue’s creation was the abolition of slavery in America. Possibly France did not feel America deserved a monument dedicated to freedom as long as a significant portion of its population was enslaved. That is not to say the Statue was dedicated to the abolition of slavery (else Liberty’s tablet would surely have been emblazoned with the date of emancipation, not the date of its formal break from Britain), but that this happy change of affairs inspired some of those behind the gift to support the project. 

One of the “Documents of Proof” listed in the article, the magazine section of The New York Times from 18 May 1986, states:

The creators of the Statue of Liberty knew precisely what the message was. This group of high-minded French intellectuals, neither red revolutionaries nor white-ribboned monarchists, saw an inspirational model for France in the free institutions of the United States; they planned and designed the statue for several reasons, but chiefly to convey a subtle but unmistakable signal of republicanism to their countrymen. “The creators of the statue wanted to praise the United States for its liberty, while at the same time suggesting to the French people that conditions were not the same in France, where the system of government was a kind of Caesarism,” says Pierre Provoyeur, curator of the Museums of France and general commissioner of the French exhibitions for the statue’s centennial celebration. As a gift to the people of the United States, the statue was a kind of subterfuge, a means of promoting from outside France a political alternative for France itself. The plan worked, but the statue so evolved into an American landmark and a universal symbol that it requires an act of historical imagination for today’s Frenchmen to recognize in her an image of their own past and their own political struggles.

If the statue had been intended as a tribute to prowess of black soldiers, the choice of a female form was a rather curious one. All the combatants in the Civil War (and every other war of the era) were male, and women were not exactly the gender associated with the values of freedom and liberty in either the United States or France at that time. As Marina Warner notes in her book Monuments & Maidens: The Allegory of the Female Form:

When we look at Liberty in female shape, we are not being invited to consider the freedom of women in classical times, or in the years when the statue was made and presented to the United States by the French Republic. In neither country did women enjoy equal rights, let alone special access to social and political liberties. Indeed, France was one of the last European nations to give women the vote.

In fact, the only thing said about the model on which the statue was based in The New York Times that day comes up in an excerpt from Warner’s book:

Although Bartholdi’s colossus has a stern, even implacable face, she remains unmistakably female, and indeed has been said to resemble Bartholdi’s own mother, by all accounts a grim, overbearing woman who never overcame the outrage she felt when the family home in Colmar, Alsace, was occupied by the victorious Prussians in the war of 1870.

Another excerpt from Warner indicates that the whole “the model for the Statue of Liberty was a black woman” may stem from its being confused with an earlier, abandoned project Bartholdi adapted to his new assignment:

Bartholdi’s statue gives only one explicit reference to the history of the United States: the date - July 4, 1776 - in Roman numerals on the tablet she holds in her left hand. Perhaps this was because the Statue of Liberty did not originate with the plan for New York, but with a proposal Bartholdi made in the 1860’s to the Khedive of Egypt, that he should build a huge lighthouse at the mouth of the Suez Canal. The maquettes of this project, “Egypt Bringing Light to Asia,” were directly inspired by the ancient Pharos of Alexandria, one of the Seven Wonders of the World. They still exist, and they reveal that had the Khedive agreed, the Statue of Liberty - in an Egyptian wig - would now be standing at the gates of the Middle East, not the New World.

Whatever the color of the person who served as the model for the Statue of Liberty may have been, the statue itself is colorless. It does not represent a particular color of person any more than the Michelin Tire Man does, and the idea it symbolizes applies to people of all colors, whether or not its creators intended it that way. Just as the attitudes of people who lived hundreds of years ago cannot require us look upon others as inferiors today, neither can they magically elevate the status of those who may still be the objects of discrimination. That is a task for those of us who live here and now. 

Barbara “the man who sought Liberty’s talents” Mikkelson 
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/history/american/statueofliberty.asp#CA1ilgLULe0vfV36.99

inabasket:

cool it comes with a free refill 

(via horriblewarning)

  • Dude: I will fuck /ALL/ the girls, but I will only marry a virgin.
  • Sexually Active Woman: I have had sex with someone before you, but care for you deeply.
  • Dude: Alas, we cannot marry. However, feel free to touch my penis at your leisure.
  • ....
  • Dude: I will fuck /ALL/ the girls, but I will only marry a virgin.
  • Sexually Active Woman: I have not had sex with anyone before you. I will not sit on your penis until marriage.
  • Dude: Hark! A woman that I can experience sexual frustration with. We can gaze longingly into each other's eyes and play a game of "What's virginity, anyway?" where we fondle, lick, and suck each other and label virginity as only penetrative sex.
  • Sexually Active Woman: Oh, the things you teach me, mighty stallion. For I have never known the pleasures of heavy petting. Oooh. Oooooh. Ahhh. Ah. *breaks fourth wall by winking at passing tumblr readers*

odiedragon:

solitae:

leftenantreece:

2112tryptophanbonfires:

ANNIE - Official Trailer (2014)

I’m not gonna lie, I teared up a little bit when I saw the trailer.

I’m sooo excited for this… cheese fest and all!

this is so freaking adorable and yes i cried. I can’t wait.

I CAN’T WAIT

So I’ll probably get slammed for this (because, tumblr) but here goes anyway.  Ask box is open, slam away.

When the original Little Orphan Annie was written, chronologically we were a lot closer to a time where there was a strong bias against Irish people.  By making Annie red haired, it was implied that she was of Irish descent, and by extension, the audience would have inherently known that was part of the bias against her.

Changing Annie’s race to African American replicates this same dynamic in modern society, and that’s a big part of why so many people were upset by it.  A BLACK orphan?!  Nooooooo, keep her white and red haired and cute I DON’T WANT TO DEAL WITH HOW THIS IS MAKING ME UNCOMFORTABLE.

Casting Annie as black in 2014 is a much more true to the original character than casting her as a caucasian red head.

(via so-treu)